Skip to content
SmartTelescopes by Infocedia

Comparison

DWARF 3 vs DWARF mini: Is the Bigger DWARF Worth $130 More?

Dwarflab's two small smart telescopes compared: sensor, lens, filters, EQ mode, battery, storage, weight and what reviewers found, for $549 and $419.

By Published 2 min read

This page contains affiliate links; we may earn from purchases made through them. Learn more

AI-generated photo-style image of two flat dual-lens smart telescopes of different sizes
AI-generated image

Our pick

Dwarflab

DWARF 3

7.6/10 research score

8 MP IMX678, 35 mm lens, 128 GB and up to 5.5 hours, for $549.

Dwarflab

DWARF mini

7.0/10 research score

840 g with EQ mode up to 90 s, for $419; 2 MP images.

The short answer

The DWARF 3 is worth the extra $130 for most people: an 8 MP Sony IMX678 sensor instead of 2 MP, a 35 mm lens, 128 GB and a longer battery life. Choose the DWARF mini if weight is everything (840 g) or as a second, grab-and-go scope.

Dwarflab sells two small smart telescopes that look alike but differ inside. The DWARF 3 ($549) is the all-rounder; the DWARF mini ($419) is the smallest and lightest smart telescope we cover. We compared Dwarflab's specs with independent reviews; we have not tested them ourselves. See how we research.

Specs side by side

Spec DWARF 3 DWARF mini
Aperture / focal length 35 / 150 mm 30 / 150 mm
Telephoto sensor Sony IMX678, 1/1.8", 8 MP, 2 µm Sony IMX662, 1/2.8", 2.07 MP, 2.9 µm
Wide-angle camera 2 MP 2.07 MP
Dual-band filter OIII 20 nm / Hα 12 nm 493 nm (30 nm) / 656 nm (15 nm)
Longest exposure (EQ) 60 s 90 s
Battery 10,000 mAh, up to 5.5 h 7,000 mAh, about 4 h
Storage 128 GB 64 GB
Wi-Fi range up to 20 m up to 15 m
Weight 1.35 kg (3 lb) 840 g (1.85 lb)
Operating temperature -10 °C to 45 °C -20 °C to 45 °C
Price $549 from $419

From Dwarflab's product and comparison pages, checked October 17, 2026. Both have a 2-year warranty, RAW (FITS/TIFF) files and automatic GoTo and stacking.

The sensor is the big difference

The DWARF 3's IMX678 has about four times the pixels of the mini's IMX662. AstroBackyard, which prefers the mini for its own travel use, still says the DWARF 3 is "the better all-rounder if you want more resolution". High Point Scientific (a retailer) lists the mini's "limited 2.1 MP resolution" as its main drawback. The mini's larger pixels are low-noise, and AstroBackyard was impressed by its Pleiades image, but you have little room to crop.

Where the mini wins

  • Weight: 840 g against 1.35 kg. It's the one to pack for a flight or a hike.
  • Longer EQ exposures: 90 seconds per Dwarflab, against 60 on the DWARF 3.
  • Cold weather: rated down to -20 °C.
  • Price: $130 less.

Which should you buy?

  • DWARF 3 for better images, a bigger battery and storage. Read the review.
  • DWARF mini if every gram counts, or as a second scope alongside a bigger one. Read the review.

Not set on Dwarflab? Compare the DWARF 3 vs Seestar S30 Pro.

Specs compared marks the best published figure in each row
Spec Dwarflab DWARF 3 Dwarflab DWARF mini
Research score 7.6/10 research score 7.0/10 research score
List price $549 $419
Optics
Aperture 35 mm (best) 30 mm
Focal length 150 mm 150 mm
Focal ratio f/4.3 (best) f/5
Optics Apochromatic dual-camera lens group Telephoto lens
Field of view 3.38° diagonal (telephoto), 50.6° (wide-angle) 2.45° diagonal (telephoto), 50.59° diagonal (wide-angle)
Camera
Image sensor Sony IMX678 Starvis 2, 1/1.8 in Sony IMX662, 1/2.8 in
Sensor resolution 8 MP (best) 2.1 MP
Pixel size 2 µm 2.9 µm
Wide-angle camera Yes Yes
RAW / FITS files Yes Yes
Filters and imaging
Light-pollution filter Yes Yes
Built-in filters VIS, astro (IR-extended), dual-band (OIII/Hα) Astro, dark-frame, dual narrowband
Solar filter included Yes Yes
Longest single exposure 60 s 90 s (best)
Mount and tracking
Equatorial mode Yes Yes
Field derotation No No
Autofocus Not published Yes
Eyepiece No No
Power and storage
Battery life 5.5 h (best) 4 h
Battery capacity 10,000 mAh (best) 7,000 mAh
Built-in storage 128 GB (best) 64 GB
Connectivity Wi-Fi and Bluetooth (up to 20 m) Wi-Fi (up to 15 m), Bluetooth 5.0
Size and warranty
Weight 2.98 lb 1.85 lb (best)
Dimensions 222 × 142 × 65 mm 100.4 × 183.6 × 60.7 mm
Operating temperature -10 °C to 45 °C -20 °C to 45 °C
Warranty 2 years 2 years
Where to buy Check price at Dwarflab (opens in a new tab) Check price at Dwarflab (opens in a new tab)

Frequently asked questions

Which DWARF is better for astrophotography?

The DWARF 3, mainly because of its sensor. At 8 MP against the mini's 2.07 MP it gives far more room to crop and print, and its 35 mm lens gathers about a third more light. The mini's large 2.9 µm pixels are low-noise, but its images are small.

Can both DWARFs do EQ mode?

Yes. Dwarflab rates the DWARF 3 for 60-second and the mini for 90-second exposures in equatorial mode. High Point Scientific reports up to 120 seconds on the mini.

Do either come with a tripod?

No. Both need a tripod (Dwarflab sells one for $89). The DWARF 3 includes a magnetic solar filter and a carrying bag; the mini includes an ND solar filter.

Sources

Specs, prices and claims in this article come from these sources.

  1. DWARF product comparison · Dwarflab · accessed Oct 17, 2026
  2. DWARF 3 product page · Dwarflab · accessed Oct 17, 2026
  3. DWARF mini product page · Dwarflab · accessed Oct 17, 2026
  4. DWARF mini review · AstroBackyard · accessed Oct 18, 2026
  5. DWARF Mini Smart Telescope: Full Review · High Point Scientific · accessed Oct 18, 2026
  6. DWARF 3 review · Galactic Hunter · accessed Oct 18, 2026

Written by

SmartTelescopes editorial team

Research and editing

The SmartTelescopes editorial team researches smart telescopes from manufacturer documents, published measurements and owner reports.

Review

DWARF mini Review: The Lightest Smart Telescope You Can Buy

At 840 g, the DWARF mini packs a 30 mm lens, a Sony IMX662 sensor, a dual narrowband filter, a wide-angle camera and EQ mode into a body 18 cm tall, for $419. We compare its published specs with what reviewers found.

Published